Response Paper on On Being an Atheist, by H. J. McCloskey From a Essay

Response Paper on On Being an Atheist, by H. J. McCloskey From a Christian Viewpoint - Essay ExampleWhile to some this position on face value may seem to have credibility, a minute analysis of the theories from a Christian perspective shows his careens lacking.The first thing that strikes is McCloskeys choice of beginning his discourse with a usual and chronically pleading argument that would appear to make sense and put the entire onus of believing or of faith on a human need to want to believe, kinda than a spiritual analysis of why we do. McCloskey puts forth that many theists take the position that atheism is a cold, comfortless position,1, and quotes one Christian as saying, Its harder if you dont believe in God. 2 McCloskeys argument, which he extracts totally from this position, is a tired one at best, tied to a human-centred era the 1960s that overly promoted, at the exclusion of the spiritual founded in the intellectual, the concept of science, be it the science of human psychology or otherwise. Proof is the buzzword, a fantastical choice since proof of this overriding human need to feel comfortable in an uncomfortable world has never been proven, but is itself founded on the discoveries suggested by psychologists and sociologists and hardly based in solid scientific irrefutable fact. Much of McCloskeys so called scientific approach falls far short of anything resembling proof.Consider McCloskeys cosmological argument as examined by Privette (2009). McCloskey argued that the cosmological argument was an argument from the existence of the world, as we know it. He stated that believing in an uncaused first cause of the universe is a problem because nothing about our universe forces us to that conclusion.3 I agree with Privette and would use the following argument, as she has, with a few of my own thoughts added on the concept of contingencies. If